|
Monday, January 28, 2008
Listening to Dr. Steve Kurtz talking about Expression Management...
Posted at 11:27 pm by balduffington
Permalink
Sunday, January 20, 2008
there will be balloons (movies)

Quiet and cold in the great northeast and I'm still working on my garden daydreams, my paintings and short stories, and filling my eye with as much information as I can. Movie theaters are generally well heated and visually satisfying. Juno was a sweet movie with a catchy soundtrack, Lawrence of Arabia was a four hour trek of a treat, and this weekend we have two more. I am so excited to see this movie again because I have never been able to shake the visual influence of a red balloon. The other night we went to see There Will be Blood and while it was a good movie, well acted and well done, I just wanted more glee than gloom, more light than dark, and the ending was just too disturbing for one who appreciates bowling without blood. My husband loved it though, and he's still doing his impersonation of Daniel Day Lewis' distinctive character. "We'll take the potatoes" Both movies are worth seeing, and so I guess that's what I'm suggesting you see 'em both. Maybe not on the same day, though. take care, Rachael
Posted at 03:29 pm by balduffington
Permalink
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
images from my sketchbook
Time to share the best page so far from my current sketchbook, anonymous man on the bus, a few haiku, and the orange cord. 
 And on a busy day at work, I had a chance to take a lunch break and walk to a playground in the neighborhood. I'd been thinking that I needed to slow down, calm down. When I sat down to eat my lunch I found some book pages from some stranger's abandoned and destroyed book on Zen Buddhism. I drew a tree. Just now I photoshopped the white core of the tree and marvelled at what we can notice in the world when we slow down... take care, Rachael
Posted at 06:24 pm by balduffington
Permalink
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
When green in January, we Upstate New Yorkers think it will snow and when it snows, we think about green. So says the New York Times , so says me. I've been daydreaming about my garden this year and filling page after page of sketchbook, notebook and seed catalog with ideas to cover the whole backyard with moons and stars , kaleidoscope carrots , and bright lights chard. I know I'll need to combine my daydreams with some solid research, planning, and careful thinking about how exactly two very busy people will plant, pay attention to, and harvest watermelons, lettuces, peppers, tomatoes, strawberries, melons, squash, beans and eggplants in our city backyard. That said, I know right now that if all else fails I will be planting my mesclun mix which was a miracle last year; allowing me to cut my lunch everyday, eat well and get my hands in dirt. think edible landscaping is my direction this year. Since the supermarket in my neighborhood is closing, I will aim to grow more of our summer meals. This means being smarter about starting some seeds. but I love the poetry and wisdom of starting them in eggshells I will be planning my plantingthis year. I will, I will, I will. Cornell Cooperative Extension has great gardening resources
I'm back to daydreaming, it is my day off afterall. I'm allowed. take care, Rachael
Posted at 01:58 pm by balduffington
Permalink
Sunday, January 13, 2008
More accessible, exciting theoretical physics from Janna Levin
 I have a bad habit of not believing my husband. When he told me it was Cate Blanchett playing Bob Dylan in I'm Not There, I didn't believe him even after I'd seen the movie and when he told me that Janna Levin would be Krista Tippet's guest on Speaking of Faith. I've apologized. Listen to this hour long conversation between two smart women willing to explore ideas and possiblities. Janna Levin on Speaking of Faith, Jan 08
I think I've written here before how closest thing I have to a religion is listening to this show (the closest thing to spirituality, well maybe that's my daily practice of sketchbook keeping, talking to strangers, and trying to be good.) And I know I wrote a quick thing about how going on a tuesday night in the Fall to a lecture by Levin shocked some dumb but persistent assumptions I'd held: math has no relevance to my life (ha! it's everywhere) mathematicians were dull, physics is impossible to understand or talk about specialized math or physics problems are the domain of specialists art and math have little in common

Truth is, at the math department of the scientific research universities, the mathemations were probably thinking the same thing about art and artists. Pretty often I meet people who are incredibly knowledgable and skilled in their own careers but have no way of accessing art(by which I mostly refer here to hand-made things meant to be enjoyed mostly visually, although the minute I write the rule, I think of the exceptions...) Anyway, the point is, to many people art is irrelevant. Maybe they've decided it isn't important, art is a rich person's game, the art world is full of "phoneys and phakes", and making art or finding meaning is only available to specialists.
But it's not! In the past couple of days, I've watched 40 people (regular Joe and Jane manager types who get things done in a university department), follow some steps and learn to pull some bowls off the wheel. Yesterday I met a woman who is studying science but applying it to studying a painting.
I have a lot more reading, listeming, and thinking to do but I think there are ways to make swiss cheese out of the old ideas that art needs a capital letter and is only for the designated few but it seems like this is also true of math...
Anyway, below are my notes from Janna's talk in September in Rochester and I'm off to find her book and read it as my fiction class starts this week and I love the idea of using fiction to make theories resonate...
Ok, take care, Rachael
How a talk with pictures and ideas can open up the Megaverse Janna Levin at RIT’s Caroline Werner Gannett Project lecture on September 11, 2007
Rachael Baldanza
Janna Levin spoke eloquently, passionately, and animatedly about the universe on a weeknight in an auditorium here in upstate New York. Is the universe infinite? We won’t be trying to answer that question tonight, she told us, instead we will frame the questions, the big theories, and the ways in which theoretical physics attempts to solve these and other mysteries (What if there are many dimensions? Is the universe infinitely old? Is there an infinite number of galaxies?). Luckily, her language was always clear, her talk was completely illustrated, and her metaphors were rich. She challenged the idea that we can see the universe as a backdrop, a stage set, or a screen. “The universe is space and time itself. Not a stage, but an integral part of our lives. We live on a second generation star in an ordinary solar system around an ordinary planet.” “ We live in space time.” Space is what can be measured with rulers, time is what you can measure with clocks. We locate ourselves by a physical location (North/South, East/West and height as in the 4th floor of a building) and at a certain time (at 7:05pm). As it was September 11th, when Levin used a location in New York City to orient herself, the people sitting near me nodded solemnly. Memory has a location too. Levin used a digital image of a small cartoonish green turtle to illustrate the idea that the Earth is finite and edgeless. This little green turtle could walk around the world and come back to where he started. But what if the universe is infinite? Our little green turtle might walk and never come back. There would be no sense of an edge even. Did the universe have an origin? Einstein believed the universe was permanent. The remnant echo of the origin of the universe was found in New Jersey. By the time Levin was telling us about the potential for a megaverse, we were all enthralled. Instead of a standard diagram or theoretical model, Levin used a drawing to illustrate the idea that a universe could be a part of a larger megaverse, wart like forms bubbling off and around an amorphous shape. A student in the middle of the audience asked, “how does someone start in theoretical physics? How did you start?” She had dropped out of high school, started her study in philosophy at Barnard but noticed that philosophers couldn’t be wrong. The only times she saw her philosophy colleagues get ‘trumped’ was when someone brought in science, an arena in which ideas could be changed.
Posted at 08:46 am by balduffington
Permalink
|
|